Economic Update : The FCNR (B) deluge Liquidity Management by Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd
USD inflows under the subsidized FCNR(B)+ scheme have exceeded expectations by a wide margin, sparking wide-ranging debate on the implications for markets, policymakers' stance and balance sheets, and the broader economy. We address five questions we have frequently encountered in most client conversations.
1 How much liquidity is ‘too much’
FCNR(B)+ inflows have far exceeded expectations, taking banking/durable liquidity to Rs11trn+/14trn+. With $136bn already mobilized vs our earlier $90bn estimate, the real issue is the ~$45-50bn (~Rs4.3-4.7trn) excess, which could leave liquidity materially above the RBI’s ~0.8-1.0% NDTL comfort zone by end-FY27. While this has lowered banks’ funding costs and eased NIM pressures, the system excess now likely calls for more durable sterilization. Lower funding costs should support banks’ profitability even as excess liquidity is subsequently absorbed. Notably, tightening from such elevated surplus levels need not squeeze the system, but instead allow the RBI’s rate and liquidity bias to move in sync ahead.
How does this change our liquidity forecast math
We now estimate end-FY27E system/durable core liquidity at ~Rs7.1/8.6trn (~2.2/2.7% of NDTL), well above RBI's 0.8-1.0% comfort zone, and a sharp shift from our pre-August estimate of sub-0.8% by end-FY27. The key swing factor is BoP, now seen above $100bn (vs ~$45-50bn earlier), alongside a sizable CIC leakage of ~Rs5trn (12.1% of GDP), skewed toward 2H on pre-UP election spending and inflation. The excess glut stands at ~1.35% of NDTL (~Rs4.3trn) above comfort — needing durable sterilization, not just temporary tools. The simplest visible lever may be to let >90% of FY27 forward maturities run off, to naturally bring liquidity back to ~1% of NDTL, though at some cost to FX markets and RBI’s book.
Sterilization toolkit – Which tool for which liquidity problem
A blended approach—calibrated to the durability, effectiveness, and incidence of cost of each tool—appears most sensible.
VRRRs – Quick and reversible, but a poor fit for a multi-year problem: banks resist locking funds beyond a few days, and overnight rates remain stuck sub-repo. Widening access to nonbanks (MFs, insurers), à la the Fed's RRP, could make it more effective.
FX sell/buy swaps – Push the problem into the future rather than solve it, carrying rollover risk and an all-in cost <7% annualized (3.4% forward premia + 4% opportunity cost on foregone USD returns), with large auctions already pressuring forward premia
OMO sales – Durable+effective; also easing RBI's bloated balance sheet, with ample room in 3-5Y maturities (Rs3.9/8.4trn over 3/5Y). But it adds bond supply/pushes up yields.
CRR/I-CRR hikes – Blunt but durable and directly targets M3 growth. However, a 1% hike absorbs only half the excess, penalizes banks disproportionately, including non-FCNR participants, and risks a confusing signal too soon after last year's CRR cut.
MSS/CMBs – Scalable, but shifts the cost to GoI's books at a time of fiscal strain (Brent: >$100/bl), making government buy-in uncertain. With the RBI already holding ample securities and the SDF available, its original rationale is weaker today.
What is the least costly way to manage the liquidity deluge
There are no free lunches: Someone has to bear the cost, be it banks, the RBI, GoI, or bondholders. The least-cost strategy is likely a mix of tactical VRRR/SDF, selective FX operations, and, as persistence becomes clearer, a more durable CRR/OMO sale. Our cost assessment for absorbing each 0.5% of NDTL ranks CRR as the costliest for banks, closely followed by FX swaps and OMOs. MSS is cheaper from the RBI’s perspective, but GoI bears the cost, while SDF is cheapest but neither durable nor sufficiently scalable. RBI may finally lean on CRR despite its bluntness, given that it is most potent for containing M3 growth.
How should policymakers maximize the upside and manage the risks
Maximise returns on this dollar debt – This inflow is a future dollar liability, so funds must be deployed productively to offset that cost. Given India's past struggle to attract durable foreign capital, this pool of savings offers a chance to reset. Using it well could strengthen India's positioning for quality capital flows in the long term.
Watch credit quality and inflation – The credit multiplier could further boost an alreadystrong cycle (pre-FCNR credit growth already ~17%), so credit quality and risk build-up need monitoring, alongside inflation risk, given the ongoing cyclical demand upturn
Domestic demand-driven CAD risk – Demand-led growth could lift import demand, widening the CAD. Liquidity gains may skew toward consumption/investment rather than financial savings, adding to this risk
For Detailed Report With Disclaimer Visit. https://choicebroking.in/disclaimer
SEBI Registration no.: INZ 000160131
